Chapter 9 #2

2.
A.
a. No the story focuses on an event that already happened decreasing the immediacy. This is because the story is about a matter that is not pressing or very interesting.
b. This story is not written in conversational style, its more paraphrased
c. This story is written tightly because it it pretty concise and informative
d. This story is confusing however because it uses two different stories and forms them together.

B.
a. Yes this story emphasizes it's immediacy because it starts out by saying the amount of people that died and the lead is very intriguing, the idea of explosions also is appealing.
b. This story is written is conversational style because it flows the way you would read it.
c. This story is not written tightly because it is too wordy and it takes too long to tell the story. You do not want to read any more of it after the story.
d. It is written clearly but it is too long to read for a broadcast setting.

C.
a. The lead uses the word "Attack" but is is unclear in its meaning, therefore making light of a situation that should be clearly immediate.
b. The story is written in a paraphrased manner that tells the story using points that are obviously summarized.
c. The story is written too tightly because it does not use proper detail to accurately tell the story. Detail is clearly needed to establish points.
d. This story has a pressing lead but does not accurately tell the story and makes it very confusing to understand what the point of the story is and what happened.